IJS Short Reports
  • Users Online: 98
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 25-30

The role of plastic surgery in global health: A narrative review


Department of Plastic Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK

Date of Web Publication26-Jul-2017

Correspondence Address:
Mimi R Borrelli
Department of Plastic Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH
UK
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijssr.ijssr_15_17

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Background: There is growing awareness of the substantial global burden of surgical disease. Conditions treated effectively by plastic and reconstructive procedures make a large proportion of the global surgical diseases, and disproportionately affect individuals at the lower end of the economic spectrum. Methods: This article reviews the role of plastic surgery in global health, highlights the ongoing need for plastic and reconstructive surgery globally, and increasing efforts that have been made to meet these needs. Results: There global shortage of plastic surgeons in low and middle income countries, but plastic surgery has a long tradition of humanitarian aid, has been a leader in global surgery development. Plastic and reconstructive surgical care has increasingly been shown to be cost effective and to have an immense impact on the economy of a region, delivering a substantial return on investment. More sustainable global surgical care is essential in future, requiring ongoing efforts from the plastic surgery community, greater recognition of the problems that can be addressed at policy level, and research to help guide policy-makers when facing the decision of allocating scarce resources. Conclusion: There is a fundamental role of plastic surgery in global health.

Keywords: Global, health, plastic, reconstructive, surgery


How to cite this article:
Borrelli MR. The role of plastic surgery in global health: A narrative review. IJS Short Rep 2017;2:25-30

How to cite this URL:
Borrelli MR. The role of plastic surgery in global health: A narrative review. IJS Short Rep [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 26];2:25-30. Available from: http://www.ijsshortreports.com/text.asp?2017/2/3/25/211657




  Introduction Top


Global health is defined as “an area for study, research, and practice that places a priority on improving health and achieving health equity for all people worldwide.”[1]

There is a growing awareness of the substantial global burden of surgical disease.[2] Surgical conditions constitute 11% of worldwide disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).[3] Around two billion people across the globe lack access to basic surgical services, and the burden is greatest in the poorest regions of the world.[4] When services are accessed, their safety, timeliness, and effectiveness are often suboptimal, and patients may become financially ruined in the process.[4],[5] An additional four million health-care workers[6] and 143 million surgeries are needed annually in developing countries to avert death and disability.[4]

Plastic surgery is one surgical specialty gaining global momentum.[7] A diversity of conditions across the world requires plastic surgical intervention, and they disproportionately affect people at the lower end of the economic spectrum, exacerbated by poverty and social circumstances.[8] The global shortage of plastic surgeons in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) to address this need is substantial.[8] This essay discusses the global need for plastic surgical intervention and the increasing efforts that have been made to meet these needs, arguing for the fundamental role of plastic surgery in global health.

The unmet plastic surgery need

Surgical conditions treated effectively by plastic and reconstructive procedures make a large proportion of the worldwide surgical disease burden. About 66% of the measured surgical disease disability-adjusted life years are due to injuries, malignancy, or congenital anomalies, the three categories most frequently treated by plastic surgical intervention.[3],[8]

Injuries and trauma comprise the greatest surgical burden.[9] War, road traffic accidents, and natural disasters can injure soft tissue, tendons, nerves, and bones, causing significant disability if untreated.[10],[11] Simple, timely, and inexpensive plastic surgical intervention from wound debridement, fracture fixation to soft tissue protection and closure, allows effective healing and reduces complications such as osteomyelitis and nonunion, and avert permanent disability. Plastic surgical management of compartment syndrome following crush injuries, the second most common cause of death after earthquake, is crucially life-saving.[12] Injuries rank as the third biggest health burden to LMIC,[13] and a lack of funding and health-care infrastructure in LMIC means patients suffer disproportionately from the health consequences of war and natural disaster.[14]

Worldwide, burns are responsible for a significant proportion of acquired deformities requiring reconstructive care.[2] Around 10.9 million people suffer from severe burns each year.[15] Burns are the 11th leading cause of death among children and the 5th leading cause of nonfatal childhood injury.[16] Burns are overrepresented in the poorest parts of the world, where large open flames are often used for cooking, live wires are exposed, and fires result from destructive wars. Burns can cause extensive scarring, compromising form and function. They can lead to malnourishment, restricted mobility, and sepsis, resulting in significant long-term disability.[17] Many burns require plastic surgical expertise for burn excision, skin grafting, contracture release, corrective and reconstructive surgeries for optimal healing, as well as physiotherapy and splinting to help maintain function. This vast need for operative intervention is often not met in the developing world.[15]

Congenital anomalies account for an estimated 9% of the burden of surgical disease,[3] and cleft lip and palate (CLP) are among the most common congenital anomalies in the world, affecting 1 in 500–1000 live births[18] [Figure 1]. CLP increases perinatal mortality,[19] and surviving CLP infants are at increased risk of malnutrition, infection, and speech and feeding problems.[19],[20] Children with CLP may be stigmatized and ostracized from their communities and be denied education and employment opportunities.[21] Newborns with cleft deformities have been known to be suffocated by midwives.[21] Lack of knowledge relating to CLP augments the problem in resource-limited countries.[22] Dramatic improvement in appearance and speech can be achieved in one or two reconstructive operations, but in the developing world, access to CLP care is severely limited. There is a backlog of around 4,000,000 untreated CLP patients worldwide,[23] the majority of whom live in the developing world.[8] These people live with the physical, psychological, and socioeconomic consequences of clefts throughout their lives and cause a tremendous cost to productivity.[24],[25],[26]
Figure 1: Child with cleft lip, redrawn from www.facesofhopeantigua.org

Click here to view


There are a number of additional global diseases that lead to problems requiring a plastic and reconstructive intervention. Congenital diseases include syndactyly or constriction band syndrome,[27] and acquired conditions include surgical infections such as necrotizing soft tissue infections, abscesses, and osteomyelitis. NOMA (necrotizing ulcerative stomatitis), an orofacial gangrene found mainly in children, is linked to poverty, malnutrition, and disease [Figure 2].[28] 140,000 patients worldwide are affected each year. The mortality rate is 90%, and survivors often suffer from serious facial disfigurement, trismus, oral incontinence, and speech problems.
Figure 2: African child with NOMA (necrotizing ulcerative stomatitis) of the left cheek, redrawn from www.facingafrica.org

Click here to view


Plastic surgical services are recognized as relatively low-cost means of alleviating or resolving the immense suffering from these disabling conditions.[7],[29] Developing countries frequently lack resources devoted to plastic surgery to meet the demand.[9] In China or India, there are less than one-tenth of the plastic surgeons per million people as in North America (~1.5 vs. ~6 surgeons per million).[8] Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have less and in some cases none at all.[8] Plastic surgical expertise tends to be concentrated in urban areas where surgeons may use their skills for cosmetic purposes or other more lucrative interventions, rather than to decrease the burden of disease in the far more populous rural regions.[30] It is clear that globally there are unmet plastic surgical needs.[31]

Meeting the need

Action to improve health and health equity is integral to global health.[32] Plastic and reconstructive surgery has a long tradition of international service, and the humanitarian importance of the discipline is now stronger than ever.[33] Over 100 plastic surgery, nonprofit associations have been founded, aiming to increase plastic surgical services for people in the developing world.[7] ReSurg (previously Interplast), Operation Smile, and Smile Train are examples targeting safe and effective CLP care.

Surgical “mission-trips” have been one approach to address the gap in plastic surgical care and increase the availability of plastic surgical care in LMIC. Missions are short-term humanitarian operations where human resources, expertise, and supplies are delivered by a team of volunteer surgeons and medical personnel into areas of the world with limited access to specialized medicine.[34],[35],[36] Humanitarian organizations have organized outreach programs for decades, and today hundreds of reconstructive and plastic surgery missions are conducted in the developing world providing surgeries for craniofacial deformities, congenital defects including CLP repair, burns, and trauma.[37],[38],[39]

The 'mission model' has been immensely effective in delivering safe, well-timed, high-quality surgery to patients requiring reconstructive treatment in manners congruent with needs and constraints.[26],[40] Surgical missions affect immediate change that has sustained impact on health and quality of lives for patients, their families,[26] and their society.[24] CLP surgical mission trips are highly cost effective and compare favorably to other diseases targeted by global aid.[41],[42]

Successful missions involve effective communication and balanced teams of technicians, nurses, anesthetists, administrators, and occupational therapists.[15] Partnerships between governments, national ministries of health, nonprofit organizations, and local medical personnel are essential to improve permission patient identification and ensure pre- and post-operative care. This partnership is also necessary to manage country logistics and bureaucratic and provide cultural and linguistic competency to complement the technical skills of the surgical team.[43],[44],[45] Quality control protocols ensure delivery of safe, sustainable, ethically sound, high-quality care.[40],[46] Cultural awareness and sensitivities to patients' social and cultural expectations are important in providing patient-centered care.[15]

In humanitarian plastic surgical initiatives, there has been a shift from supporting missions to building care centers, which prioritize sustainability and build quantity, capacity, and availability of the local health-care systems through education or financial support.[26],[34] Developing health-care infrastructure involves empowering medical staff, improving education, and training of in-country personnel and construction of new units, such as cleft centers.[47] Supporting local surgeons in their care for their indigent patients is the most cost-effective method of increasing access to care.[31] Unlike missions, none of the travel or similar costs associated with foreigners are incurred. Sustainable development creates long-term independent health systems and provides integrated care (e.g., physiotherapy and wound care), and long-term follow-up to augment plastic surgical services enhances the status of local medical personnel and avoids service gaps in the wake of the mission.[7],[35] Developing the health system as a whole only has minimally distortive effects on local health care as compared to mission models and may stimulate the local microeconomy.[48] Multilateral partnerships between local and international teams are of primary importance in building sustainable surgical efforts in developing countries.[25] Collaboration generates a gateway for cross-cultural education exchange and the introduction of new surgical practice techniques.[15]

Education of health-care personnel and students is fundamental to sustainability and necessary for responding to the global surgical workforce crisis.[49] Education enables rapid dissemination of medical and surgical knowledge in LMIC, across a range of health-care professions, covering a variety of topics from specific surgical operations to physiotherapy skills, nursing, and postanesthesia care.[19] Training of local medical staff enables them to perform progressively more complex procedures, and ultimately they become self-sufficient.[50] This is more cost effective and sustainable than importing foreign teams and can have a greater impact locally.[25] Practitioners can be supported to train elsewhere if training is not available in their native country, but risks the educated, qualified practitioners not returning, contributing to the “brain drain” of plastic surgeons.[51]

Efforts have also been made to educate patients. One group provided a discharge sheet to patients outlining postoperative cleft repair care, which significantly reduced the incidence of lip wound infections.[52] For volunteers, international aid enhances cultural competency, fosters a deeper appreciation for global public health issues, and hones the skills paramount in reducing the surgical burden of disease.[53],[54] It also makes it increasingly likely for that person to incorporate international volunteerism as part of their career.[55]

Both mission and care center models have their own unique advantages and are complementary rather than competing. Missions are better able to manage present emergent needs, and care models look to improve long-term gains. A center may be better placed to approach surgical care delivery than medical missions when the country's geopolitical environment allows for a permanent health-care presence.[56] Care centers are more cost effective than mission-based care,[56] although both models are still highly cost effective and worthy of global investment.[57] Their mutual goals are to improve access to those who are deprived of plastic surgical intervention because of their circumstances and global location and ultimately to improve outcomes and quality of life.

There are a number of challenges associated with trying to increase access to plastic surgical care in the developing world. Political issues, including war and conflict, can exacerbate unmet surgical needs. Threats of violence increase the risks for any program involving foreigners. Inadequate funding, financial means, and insufficient sponsorships are on-going challenges that affect the long-term sustainability of even the most consistent projects and interventions.[35],[58]


  Conclusion Top


There is a growing awareness of the immense worldwide burden of surgical disease. This essay has argued for the significant role of plastic surgery in global health. Many conditions are in need of practitioners with plastic surgical expertise, especially in LMIC.[8] Plastic surgery has a long tradition of humanitarian aid and in many ways has been a leader in global surgery development in LMIC.[25] Plastic and reconstructive surgical care has increasingly been shown to be cost effective and to have an immense impact on the economy of a region, delivering a substantial return on investment.[7],[24] Policy and finances pose on-going difficulties. A more sustainable global surgical care is essential in future. This requires not only continued efforts from the plastic surgery community but also greater recognition of the problems that can be addressed at the policy level.[31] Research is critical in guiding policy makers when facing the decision of allocating scarce resources. Consequently, more concrete data must be compiled to determine better the burden of disease amenable to global plastic surgical interventions.[8]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 2009;373:1993-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Farmer PE, Kim JY. Surgery and global health: A view from beyond the OR. World J Surg 2008;32:533-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB, et al. Disease control priorities in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Meara JG, Greenberg SL. Global surgery as an equal partner in health: No longer the neglected stepchild. Lancet Glob Health 2015;3 Suppl 2:S1-2.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Funk LM, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Merry AF, Enright AC, et al. Global operating theatre distribution and pulse oximetry supply: An estimation from reported data. Lancet 2010;376:1055-61.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Garrett L. The challenge of global health. FOREIGN AFFAIRS-NEW YORK- 2007;86(1):14.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Corlew DS. Estimation of impact of surgical disease through economic modeling of cleft lip and palate care. World journal of surgery. 2010;34(3):391-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Semer NB, Sullivan SR, Meara JG. Plastic surgery and global health: how plastic surgery impacts the global burden of surgical disease. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2010;63(8):1244-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ozgediz D, Jamison D, Cherian M, McQueen K. The burden of surgical conditions and access to surgical care in low-and middle-income countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008;86(8):646-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
McIntyre T, Hughes CD, Pauyo T, Sullivan SR, Rogers Jr SO, Raymonville M, et al. Emergency surgical care delivery in post-earthquake Haiti: Partners in Health and Zanmi Lasante experience. World journal of surgery. 2011;35(4):745-50.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Patel A, McRae M, McRae M, Sinha I, Persing J. Plastic surgery during natural disasters: Lessons from Haiti. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:111e.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Peleg K, Reuveni H, Stein M. Earthquake disasters-lessons to be learned. Israel Med Assoc J 2002;4:361-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ezzati M, Hoorn SV, Rodgers A, Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Murray CJ; Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors. Lancet 2003;362:271-80.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Organization WH. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Patel A, Sawh-Martinez RF, Sinha I, Watkins JF, Magee WP, Persing JA. Establishing sustainable international burn missions: Lessons from India. Ann Plast Surg 2013;71:31-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mock C, Cherian M, Juillard C, Donkor P, Bickler S, Jamison D, et al. Developing priorities for addressing surgical conditions globally: Furthering the link between surgery and public health policy. World J Surg 2010;34:381-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: Systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006;367:1747-57.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Cooper ME, Ratay JS, Marazita ML. Asian oral-facial cleft birth prevalence. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2006;43(5):580-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Carlson L, Hatcher KW, Vander Burg R. Elevated infant mortality rates among oral cleft and isolated oral cleft cases: A meta-analysis of studies from 1943 to 2010. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2013;50:2-12.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Fadeyibi IO, Coker OA, Zacchariah MP, Fasawe A, Ademiluyi SA. Psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate on Nigerians: The Ikeja-Lagos experience. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012;46:13-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Dubner S, Levitt S. Bottom-line philanthropy: why can't a charity be more like a business. NY Times Mag. 2008:18-21.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Oginni FO, Adenekan AT. Prevention of oro-facial clefts in developing world. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2012;2:163-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Reddy SG, Reddy LV, Reddy RR. Developing and standardizing a center to treat cleft and craniofacial anomalies in a developing country like India. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20 Suppl 2:1664-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Alkire B, Hughes CD, Nash K, Vincent JR, Meara JG. Potential economic benefit of cleft lip and palate repair in sub-Saharan Africa. World J Surg 2011;35:1194-201.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hughes CD, Alkire B, Martin C, Semer N, Meara JG. American plastic surgery and global health: A brief history. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68:222-5.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Magee WP Jr., Vander Burg R, Hatcher KW. Cleft lip and palate as a cost-effective health care treatment in the developing world. World J Surg 2010;34:420-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Chung KC. Volunteering in the developing world: The 2003-2004 Sterling Bunnell Traveling Fellowship to Honduras and Cambodia. J Hand Surg Am 2004;29:987-93.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Marck KW. A history of noma, the “Face of Poverty”. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1702-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Grunwald TB, Garner WL. Acute burns. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:311e-9e.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Abenavoli FM. Plastic surgery in the third world. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95:1331.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Corlew DS. Perspectives on plastic surgery and global health. Ann Plast Surg 2009;62:473-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Beaglehole R, Bonita R. What is global health? Global Health Action. 2010;3.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Semplicini A, Vindigni V, Giatsidis G, Chiarelli A. Padova hospitale onlus: Report of a 15-year experience in surgical and medical assistance in developing countries. Ann Plast Surg 2013;71:6-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Abenavoli FM. Operation smile humanitarian missions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:356-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Zbar RI, Rai SM, Dingman DL. Establishing cleft malformation surgery in developing nations: A model for the new millennium. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:886-9.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Lett R. International surgery: Definition, principles and Canadian practice. Can J Surg 2003;46:365-72.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Chancholle A. Plastic surgery, cleft lip and palate and the Third World. Annals of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery. 2004;49(3):236.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Furr MC, Larkin E, Blakeley R, Albert TW, Tsugawa L, Weber SM. Extending multidisciplinary management of cleft palate to the developing world. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:237-41.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Yeow VK, Lee ST, Lambrecht TJ, Barnett J, Gorney M, Hardjowasito W, et al. International task force on volunteer cleft missions. J Craniofac Surg 2002;13:18-25.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Shrime MG, Sleemi A, Ravilla TD. Charitable platforms in global surgery: A systematic review of their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and role training. World J Surg 2015;39:10-20.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Poenaru D. Getting the job done: Analysis of the impact and effectiveness of the SmileTrain program in alleviating the global burden of cleft disease. World J Surg 2013;37:1562-70.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Alkire BC, Vincent JR, Meara JG. Benefit-Cost Analysis for Selected Surgical Interventions in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2015. 361 p.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Dodard M, Fournier A. Plastic surgery in global health: The role of primary care infrastructure. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:1073-4.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Hollier LH Jr., Sharabi SE, Koshy JC, Schafer ME, O'Young J, Flood TW. Surgical mission (Not) impossible-now what? J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:1488-92.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Nugent AG, Panthaki Z, Thaller S. The Planning and Execution of Surgical Hand Mission Trips in Developing Countries. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2015;26(4):1055-7.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Eberlin KR, Zaleski KL, Snyder HD, Hamdan US. Quality assurance guidelines for surgical outreach programs: a 20-year experience. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2008;45(3):246-55.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Persing J. The changing role of volunteer organizations and host country interactions: A personal perspective. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68:5-6.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Campbell A, Sherman R, Magee WP. The role of humanitarian missions in modern surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:295-302.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
LeBrun DG, Chackungal S, Chao TE, Knowlton LM, Linden AF, Notrica MR, et al. Prioritizing essential surgery and safe anesthesia for the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Operative capacities of 78 district hospitals in 7 low- and middle-income countries. Surgery 2014;155:365-73.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
DeGennaro VA Jr., DeGennaro VA, Kochhar A, Nathan N, Low C, Avashia YJ, et al. Accelerating surgical training and reducing the burden of surgical disease in Haiti before and after the earthquake. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23 7 Suppl 1:2028-32.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Ihekweazu C, Anya I, Anosike E. Nigerian medical graduates: Where are they now? Lancet 2005;365:1847-8.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Schönmeyr B, Restrepo C, Wendby L, Gillenwater J, Campbell A. Lessons learned from two consecutive cleft lip and palate missions and the impact of patient education. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:1610-3.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Aziz SR, Ziccardi VB, Chuang SK. Survey of residents who have participated in humanitarian medical missions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:e147-57.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Campbell A, Sherman R, Magee WP. The role of humanitarian missions in modern surgical training. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2010;126(1):295-302.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Shaywitz DA, Ausiello DA. Global health: A chance for western physicians to give-and receive. Am J Med 2002;113:354-7.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Hackenberg B, Ramos MS, Campbell A, Resch S, Finlayson SR, Sarma H, et al. Measuring and comparing the cost-effectiveness of surgical care delivery in low-resource settings: Cleft lip and palate as a model. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:1121-5.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: A modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008;372:139-44.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Politis GD, Schneider WJ, Van Beek AL, Gosain A, Migliori MR, Gregory GA, et al. Guidelines for pediatric perioperative care during short-term plastic reconstructive surgical projects in less developed nations. Anesth Analg 2011;112:183-90.  Back to cited text no. 58
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed142    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]